Georgia's Traditional Industries Program for Food Processing

Fiscal Year 1998-1999 Report to Industry

Table of Contents

What Is Georgia's Traditional Industries Program?

FoodPAC Organizational Chart [opens a new window]

FoodPAC 1998—1999 Calendar of Events [opens a new window]

FoodPAC Project Summaries

Environmental Projects

Environmental Technical Assistance Program for Georgia Food Processors

By-Products Recovery Research and Pilot Plant

Food Safety Projects

Development of a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model

High Pressure Pasteurization for Elimination of Salmonella and Listeria in Liquid Egg Products


Process & Product Competitiveness Projects

Low-Cost Integrated Machine Vision System for Food Quality Grading

Marination Technology and Process, Product, and Ingredient Interactions

Extending the Quality and Utilization of Frying Oils and Improving the Quality of Fried Foods

Automated Packaging System

An Automated Approach to Continuous Curing and Post-Processing of Peanuts

Assessment and Utilization of Beneficial Components in Georgia Agricultural Products and By-Products

UGA Food Processing Center: Advanced Research Initiatives and Technology Transfer

Quality Enhancement of Fried Foods Through Computer Visualization of the Frying Process


FoodPAC Infrastructure Projects

FoodPAC Implementation Projects

FoodPAC FY 1999 Program Projects


.
What Is Georgia's Traditional Industries Program?

Georgia's “traditional industries” (pulp and paper; food processing; and apparel, carpet, and textiles) have historically been the backbone of the state's industrial base. Virtually every county in Georgia is home to at least one of these industries, which combined employ 260,000 Georgians, almost half of the state's manufacturing work force. Despite their size, these leading industries in Georgia face serious international challenges to their competitive position, especially from companies in low-wage regions of the world.

Recognizing the importance of these industries to Georgia, the state established the Traditional Industries Program (TIP) in 1994. TIP is designed to bring industry leaders and university-based researchers together to develop and implement practical solutions to improve the competitiveness of pulp and paper; food processing; and apparel, carpet, and textile companies in Georgia.

Each of the three traditional industries has formed a public-private partnership where industry identifies critical competitiveness problems, then works closely with faculty from Georgia's colleges and universities to solve those problems. Since 1994, the state has invested more than $34 million to provide research, technology development, and technical assistance to Georgia's traditional industries, and industry has matched the state's investment.

Georgia's Traditional Industries Program for Food Processing and FoodPAC Georgia's Traditional Industries Program for Food Processing was established as part of the state's strategic economic development thrust for traditional industries. The program resulted in the formation of a public-private partnership among the food industry, Georgia's institutions of higher education, and Georgia's state agencies. This partnership is called the Food Processing Advisory Council or FoodPAC. In 1994, FoodPAC defined its vision as seeking to make Georgia the national and international leader in food processing in the 21st century. Toward that end, the Traditional Industries Program for Food Processing was given the mission of seeking to enhance the competitiveness of Georgia's food processing and allied industries in order to provide for economic growth through expansion of existing industries and the attraction of new food-related industries. The program addresses this mission by:

  • identifying critical issues affecting the competitiveness of the industry
  • developing realistic strategies that address identified issues
  • enhancing excellence in research and development between colleges and universities in Georgia and the food processing industry
  • developing and delivering high-impact programs targeted on critical needs
  • continually evaluating the overall effectiveness of all activities undertaken


.
Environmental Projects


Environmental Technical Assistance Program for Georgia Food Processors

Project Number FP98-EN01


Co-Project Leader

  • Jackie Sellers, The University of Georgia (706) 542-8382
  • William Merka, The University of Georgia (706) 542-9151
  • James Walsh, Georgia Institute of Technology (404) 894-8054
  • Edgerton Whittle, The University of Georgia (706) 542-7690
  • A. Estes Reynolds, The University of Georgia (706) 542-2574

Project Participants

  • Tim Foutz, Peter Jacobs, Brian Kiepper, Jeff Tepper, and Mark Welford, The University of Georgia
  • John Pierson, Georgia Institute of Technology

FY 1998 State Funding: $152,688

Industry's Concern
Georgia food processors are faced with increasing environmental issues that often require compliance with federal, state, and local regulations.

Understanding these regulations and developing systems to meet regulatory guidelines are of major concern to processors.

Project Objective
To provide technical assistance to food processors in a wide variety of areas primarily related to environmental issues. Assistance efforts in FY 1998 focused primarily on characterizing waste generation and improving water usage.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Project assistance efforts saved food processors an estimated $1.5 million annually, while more than 20 individuals received training in loss minimization and pollution prevention.

Project personnel also visited food processing plants and conducted in-plant assessments to characterize water usage and wastewater discharge and evaluated wastewater treatment operations and overall facility environmental compliance. Methods to reduce wastewater outflow, achieve compliance with appropriate regulations, and to utilize possible by-products were identified.

Training workshops were also held where food processors received instruction on the proper procedures to characterize water usage and waste-water discharge, identify inefficient systems, and develop solutions to current problems.

A dissolved air flotation (DAF) primer was completed. The 40-page primer provides operators and managers with an overview of the theory of DAF system operation as well as practical information on the actual operation of the system. The primer was used in conjunction with on-site technical assists at six facilities. It is estimated that a minimum of $50,000 can be saved at a typical food processing facility each year.

A number of presentations on the requirements of a Risk Management Program (RMP) were made to various groups across the state. An analysis of the release data for ammonia, propane, and chlorine is being conducted to support the alternative release scenario required by the program. Five years of data are being analyzed.

Water conservation audits were conducted at several facilities. These audits resulted in estimated savings of $50,000 at each facility. Project staff also worked with several groups in addressing water withdrawal from both ground and surface sources, and permit provisions related to mass versus poundage limits for pollutants.

A review of the new general permit for storm water discharge from industrial activities was conducted, and project personnel participated in several workshops where the requirements of the new permit were presented. Several facilities were assisted with the development of storm water pollution prevention plans.

The oil and grease evaluations started last year continued. The objective is to evaluate the use of a floatable oil and grease testing protocol for improving the operation of grease traps for wastewater with emulsified oil and grease often generated by cooking operations. Several field tests were conducted, but the results are inconclusive. More tests are planned.

A seminar module has been developed to address issues related to air emission, risk management, emergency planning and community right-to-know, and hazardous waste. The module was presented at two workshops.

A newsletter was also published and distributed to 1,000 food processors.

FY 1999 Project Activities
Activities will help food processors identify more efficient water uses and product recovery, uncover sources of operation inefficiency, establish a mode of operation that eliminates the difficulties that result in loss of profits, and meet other new and existing regulatory issues.


By-Products Recovery Research and Pilot Plant

Project Number FP98-EN02

Project Leader

  • Mark Eiteman, The University of Georgia (706) 542-0833

Project Participant

  • Tom Adams, The University of Georgia

FY 1998 State Funding $197,000

Industry's Concern
The U.S. Food Experts Alliance for Strategic Technology (USFEAST) has established a goal of developing environmentally friendly technologies for reducing waste generated during food processing. The key to this is identifying methods to recover by-product material either during or after processing.

Project Objective
To research and develop state-of-the-art processes for recovering by-products directly from food processing waste streams.


FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Activities focused on four areas: adding value to poultry feathers by their use as building insulation, upgrading solid carbohydrate waste, recovering and upgrading waste soft drink effluent, and extracting chemical products from pecan pith.

Researchers performed a detailed investigation of the use of dequilled poultry feathers as insulation by constructing several small model houses and studying their thermal characteristics during the summer months. These studies reveal that poultry feathers are equivalent to at least R-11 fiberglass insulation at one-fifth the cost, in addition to having several environmental and health advantages. This technology may impact the value of the state's feather waste by some $15–20 million annually.

A fermentation process was developed to convert a portion of solid carbohydrate waste (generated from bakeries and processors of sauces and creams) into lysine. Researchers are also working to convert the waste into ethanol. The goal of this particular initiative was to increase value sufficiently to permit the capture of liquid bakery waste. Researchers compared the chemical hydrolysis of mixed (raw) bakery waste using 12 different methods. The most effective chemical hydrolysis method combined high waste concentration (40%), relatively low acid concentration (2% sulfuric acid), and long reaction times (30 minutes). The yield could not be calculated on a dry basis because of the heterogeneity of the bakery waste. However, more than 80% of the total carbohydrates were hydrolyzed to reducing sugars. In addition, investigations of the enzymatic hydrolysis of mixed bakery waste seemed to demonstrate that the enzymatic process is more economical than chemical hydrolysis. Hydrolyzed starches were successfully converted into lysine and ethanol with a yield of about 30% (normal for the fermentation process used).

A process was also developed to convert soft drink into lysine. Researchers studied the fermentation of a variety of soft drinks and juice drinks from a local bottler. Final concentrations of 15 g/L lysine were achieved, corresponding to a yield of 30%. This amounts to approximately $200,000 of revenue annually, for a difference of $400,000 annually for the bottler.

Preliminary research began on recovering value-added materials from pecan pith. More than one million pounds of the material could be recovered annually from pecan pith in Georgia, with a value of several million dollars. However, lack of industry involvement slowed progress of this developmental study.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.


.
Food Safety Projects

Development of a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model

Project Number FP98-FS01

Project Leader

  • Mary-Alice Smith, The University of Georgia (706) 542-1599

Project Participants

  • Robert Brackett, Michael Doyle, and Glenn Ware, The University of Georgia

FY 1998 State Funding $21,192

Industry's Concern
Food-related illness in the United States is estimated to cost the economy several billion dollars each year. A proper understanding of the risk involved in food-borne illness could significantly reduce these costs. Minimum infectious doses are an important part of this understanding. However, standard methodologies for dose-response assessment are not yet formulated for microbial risk assessment. A perceived obstacle is the variability in host/microorganism interaction. Identifying the appropriate model will allow for comparisons among food-borne pathogens and will allow further development of a risk assessment model for these pathogens.

Project Objective
To identify the most appropriate dose-response model for food-borne pathogens.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Central to microbial risk assessment is dose-response assessment. Dose-response modeling of microbial hazards provides a standard scale of infectious potential. Especially important for regulatory purposes are minimum infectious doses, generally a product of dose-response modeling. An infectious dose (ID) is the ingested dose necessary to cause infection or illness in a percentage of the population. That is, an ID01 is the dose necessary to cause infection in 1% of the population. To identify the most appropriate dose-response model, researchers evaluated six statistical models: log-logistic, log-normal, simple exponential, flexible exponential, Beta-poisson, and Weibull-gamma. These models were tried on four organism groups (Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri, Salmonella typhosa, and Campylobacter jejuni) to determine the appropriateness of the response using the method of maximum likelihood. The data sets represented a range of quality that is typical for microbial dose-response. Infectious doses (ID01) were then calculated using each model. (See table, opposite page.)

The Weibull-gamma model was the only model to fit all the data sets and proved the most suitable for describing the food-borne pathogen dose-response data.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.




High Pressure Pasteurization for Elimination of Salmonella and Listeria in Liquid Egg Products

Project Number FP98-FS02

Project Leader

  • Yen-Con Hung, The University of Georgia (770) 412-4739

Project Participants

  • Robert Brackett, Gabriel Ezeike, Parameswarakumar Mallikarjunan, and Romeo Toledo, The University of Georgia
  • Daniel Vance, National Egg Products Corporation

FY 1998 State Funding $94,680

Industry's Concern
Egg products (liquid, frozen, and dried) are an important part of our food supply due to their wide use as an ingredient in many food products such as bakery, mayonnaise, salad dressing, and egg noodles. The Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970 led to regulations requiring that all egg products be rendered free from Salmonella by the application of appropriate pasteurization processes. However, despite adherence to the pasteurization protocols recommended by the USDA for liquid egg products, outbreaks of food poisoning from the consumption of egg products or foods manufactured with them as ingredients are still occurring. This is due to survival of some vegetative and spore-forming microorganisms capable of causing post- pasteurization spoilage, which may shorten the shelf life of pasteurized egg products.


Project Objectives
To modify the high pressure intensifier unit to handle viscous products like liquid egg and to control the temperature rise on the product after high temperature treatment; to determine the effect of pressure, steps to convert potential energy to heat energy after high pressure treatment, holding time after high pressure treatment on microbial inactivation in liquid egg; and to determine the effect of different treatment variables on quality of liquid egg products and compare properties with that produced using conventional treatments.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Studies were conducted using two different high pressure throttling processes (HPT). The first processing system consisted of a hydraulic-driven, double-acting pressure intensifier capable of pressurizing the fluid to 45,000 psi (300 MPa), a high pressure hold tube, a throttling valve, a low pressure hold tube, and a cooling heat exchanger. Tests were conducted on inactivation of a suspension of 24h actively growing Pseudomonas putida in nutrient broth, a suspension of 48h Lactobacillus sake cells in MRS broth, and a suspension of 48h Zygosaccharomyces bailii cells in yeast malt broth. The test fluids were treated as follows: 0.3s dwell at 35,000 psi (242 MPa) and 0.5s dwell downstream of the orifice before cooling.

The HPT system successfully inactivated P. putida from an initial population of 108 CFU/mL to zero recovery at a 1:10 dilution. However, the HPT system only reduced L. sake (gram positive) by 2 to 4 log cycles. A suspension of Z. bailii (ascosporogenous yeast) containing 108 CFU/mL subjected to HPT was reduced 2.62 ± 0.05 log cycles.

Liquid whole eggs at 4ºC and treated at 30,000 psi (208 MPa) followed by rapid cooling to 5ºC showed no adverse changes in viscosity or appearance and was stable under refrigeration for at least 21 days. The second high pressure system could exert a maximum pressure of 60,000 psi (415 MPa) together with a pre-cooler shell and an attenuator to hold the product at the set high pressure while it was maintained in continuous flow. Because of the high viscosity of liquid egg products, preliminary tests of the unit were conducted using deionized water and skim milk. During the tests with deionized water, product outlet temperature varied with exerted pressure and was as high as 100ºC at 60,000 psi (415 MPa). A similar temperature rise was found for skim milk. As a result, effort was directed to designing a means of controlling the temperature rise, including the installation of a second micrometering valve. For this purpose, a preliminary test was also conducted using a cooling coil immersed in a constant temper-ature bath set at -20ºC and through which the deionized water was passed immediately after high pressure treatment. With the additional cooling coil after decompression, product temperature was reduced to about 20ºC in about 15 seconds.

Researchers also conceived a heat sink for rapid removal of heat during depressurization and initiated its preliminary design.

FY 1999 Project Activities
Efforts will focus on using a combination of high oxidation potential water to prewash shell eggs and high pressure pasteurization protocols to achieve the desired level of pasteurization for different liquid egg products (liquid whole egg, liquid egg white, liquid yolk, and yolk with 5% salt and 5% sugar).


.
Process and Product Competitiveness Projects

Low-Cost Integrated Machine Vision System for Food Quality Grading

Project Number FP98-PC01

Project Leader

  • Wayne Daley, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 385-0034

Project Participants

  • Ken Durden, Philip Giacomazza, Harish Kotbagi, and Tim Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Bill Leverett, Durand-Wayland, Inc.

FY 1998 State Funding $195,650

Industry's Concern
Traditionally processors have relied upon the human eye to screen for surface quality faults in food products such as fruits, vegetables, meats, and poultry. A significant aspect of this screening involves distinguishing the color of the product. Today's human screeners must manually inspect the product as it passes down the line at a high rate of speed. However, human screeners are prone to making errors because the method relies on the screener remembering the correct color as well as associating the product's color with quality standards. Eye fatigue is also of concern as it diminishes the accuracy of the inspection. Many companies, therefore, are embracing the idea of automated screening systems. In 1996, as part of the Food Processing Industry Initiative for Sensor Assessment and Evaluation, researchers began incorporating an integrated digital color camera into a practical food quality screening system.
Ideally the system will be able to screen food products for overall quality at high-rate line speeds, thus eliminating human error in grading, sorting, and quality control.

Project Objective
To develop an automated vision screening system for defect detection and grading of fruits and meats.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
The research team completed development of a prototype system for automated vision screening of grapefruit. The PC-based, dual processor pentium machine with camera component was interfaced with a commercial fruit handling system. Using G.E.O.R.G.E. (Grapefruit Evaluation with On-line Recognition Grading Environment), researchers were able to screen one grapefruit per second, which is an order of magnitude away from the required 10 grapefruits per second. Work will continue to develop hardware that will increase the system's speed to a point where it can screen 10 grapefruits per second.

The team also tested and further trained the system's neural nets. To date, the neural nets have been trained from a database of more than 1,600 images of quality defects such as skin breakdown, wet bottom, sunburn, etc. During testing, the researchers noted, however, that isolated spots or even texture on the grapefruit would be classified as defects, resulting in a higher percentage of defective area on the grapefruit. To alleviate this problem, a new approach was used that looked at a “window” around each pixel being processed. This ensured greater accuracy.

Tests also showed that defect detection was not very good on the edges of the grapefruit, due mainly to the effects of nonuniform lighting. Researchers found that an eight-light (as opposed to a four-light) system was fairly adequate to ensure near uniform lighting.

In addition, researchers further improved the modeling of grapefruit. They were able to develop a technique that showed a full view of all surfaces of the grapefruit. This avoided image overlap and ensured optimization.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.




Marination Technology and Process, Product, and Ingredient Interactions

Project Number FP98-PC02

Project Leader

  • Louise Wicker, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1055

Project Participants

  • Mark Harrison, Yao-Wen Huang, William Kerr, A. Estes Reynolds, and Romeo Toledo, The University of Georgia
  • Gordon Brown, Paramount Farms, Inc.
  • Forrest Bryden, Hormel Foods Corp.
  • Wolf Ludwig, Wolf-tec, Inc.
  • Anne Tieleman, Hercules Food Gums

FY 1998 State Funding $215,000

Industry's Concern
Marination technology is an increasingly common value-added process for muscle foods. Ingredients in marinades have been shown to minimize off-flavor development, extend shelf life, improve tenderness and juiciness, and increase yield. However, the complexity of the process along with ingredient composition and subsequent interaction often results in variability in pickup, retention, and product quality.


Project Objective
To use a combination of processing/marination technology, chemical, and enzyme technology to provide high-quality, healthier, convenient, ready-to-serve muscle foods.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Specific projects evaluated the effect of types and concentration of phosphates and phosphate blends and other process variables on quality parameters, including yield, tenderness, and juiciness.

Water hardness studies showed that the type of phosphate used makes a difference in cooked yield. A tripoly phosphate-diphosphate blend had a 3.4% higher yield compared to diphosphate alone. This translates to an economic advantage of $4,000/day for a processing plant that processes 39,000 lbs/day of breast meat just by using the right phosphate in the formulation.

Studies also showed that cut-up poultry immediately after chilling is viable and can result in cost savings in labor and cooler space. Choice of phosphate and optimization of marination process may potentially further improve product quality and reduce process time and costs. Alternatives to phosphates as water binding agents and development of new poultry products were evaluated. Pectin as a purge control agent was found to be as suitable as some phosphates and more desirable with some consumers. Researchers also determined that consumers are receptive to the concept of fruit-based marinades.

Intensive studies were conducted to determine the effect of phosphates on the ultrastructure of the muscle, the fate of phosphates, water binding properties of muscle proteins, and the mechanical properties of marinated muscle. These studies using NMR, electron microscopy, and dynamic mechanical spectroscopy with muscle proteins and pure phosphates provide the fundamental base of knowledge to predict performance of phosphates and phosphate blends on muscle texture. This should enhance the abilities of product development technologists to choose phosphates, blends, and concentrations of phosphates based on specific product needs in a processing plant.

The natural antimicrobial activity of spices and oils was evaluated as well as the feasibility of recycling marinades. Successful use of 0.5% clove oleoresin (CLO) and 0.5% pimento leaf oil (PLO) was apparent on samples stored at 4ºC that showed an increased shelf life or reduced growth rate of the test organisms. The increase in populations of bacteria in the recycled marinades over time was not unexpected. The survey did indicate that there is a difference in the amount of growth and the formation of the marinades. Differences were also noted that showed that less than desirable sanitation practices could contribute to the counts and the magnitude of the population increases. It is worth noting that E. coli counts, when monitored, increased over time. This might be of concern to processors from both a safety and sanitation standpoint.

Extension of the marination technology to other muscle foods, including beef and seafood, was also evaluated. Marinated beef strips from less tender beef cuts would provide increased consumer acceptability and convenience, provided tenderness and juiciness are maintained. The utilization of phosphates to increase tenderness and maintain juiciness and yield will provide low-cost beef cuts in a readily usable form. Data show that these methods can be easily adapted to produce a wide variety of marinated, ready-to-eat beef products of high quality, while utilizing less tender cuts as a raw material.

Lastly, the development of an effective Outreach Program for the marination of muscle foods has already had a direct impact on the U.S. food industry. Three marination workshops have been conducted, with participation from more than 100 firms, including Popeye's, KFC, Boston Market, Tyson, Cargill, ConAgra, Gold Kist, Golden Plump, Fieldale, Seaboard, and many others. It is estimated that 13% of the nation's poultry is now marketed as a marinated product. New product development efforts have also involved shrimp and fish products, with several firms now marketing new marinated products. Several Georgia firms have expanded operations to include marination, and knowledge gained from these workshops ensures that this expansion can be sustained through increased sales and higher profitability.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.




Extending the Quality and Utilization of Frying Oils and Improving the Quality of Fried Foods

Project Number FP98-PC03

Co-Project Leaders

  • Casimir Akoh, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1067
  • A. Estes Reynolds, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-2574

Project Participants

  • Manjeet Chinnan and Marilyn Erickson, The University of Georgia
  • Bill Baran, Chick-fil-A, Inc.
  • German Suarez, Wayne Farms

FY 1998 State Funding $159,950

Industry's Concern
Oils are used extensively in the processing and cooking of many Georgia agricultural commodities. Fast food and food service operations rely heavily upon deep-fat frying for cooking french fried potatoes, poultry, meat, seafood, battered and breaded vegetables. Deep-fat frying enhances the sensory properties of fried foods. However, repeated use of frying oils produces undesirable constituents that may pose health hazards and lead to quality and economic loss to the processor.

Project Objectives
To improve and extend the quality of frying oils utilized in processing Georgia agricultural commodities through regeneration technology; to develop a simplified objective assay for routine analysis of frying oil quality; to evaluate the quality of products processed using regenerated frying oil; to prevent migration of marination components from the product into the frying oil and remove undesirable flavor components from the frying oil.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Researchers have filed a patent application on the use of adsorbent combinations.

Seven commonly used filter aids (Silasorb, Britesorb, HB 600, Purifry, Frypowder, Activated Carbon, and Magnesol) as well as two commercially unavailable adsorbents (Sorbead AF and Calsilite) were studied. A number of AOCS official methods were used to evaluate their adsorptiveness, free fatty acids (FFA), conjugated diene value (CDV), total polar components (TPC), oxidative stability index (OSI), color, and viscosity (V).

High performance size exclusion chromatography was employed to determine the amount of polymers and low molecular weight compounds. When heated to 150ºC prior to filtration, HB 600 was found to reduce FFA content by 84.5%. Frypowder improved oil stability by 38.3%, and Magnesol lightened oil color by 46.3%. After statistical analysis of the data, five of them were selected, two or three of which were blended to obtain the most effective combination. The blending of HB 600 and Magnesol reduced FFA and TPC by 90.8–93.7% and 6.0–17.8%, respectively, and improved oil stability by 23.4–24.7%.

Studies also evaluated fluorescent pigment measurements as a reliable indicator of frying oil quality. Data suggest that none of the nitrogenous compounds tested (carnosine, chitosan, glycine, histidine, and lysine, 0.3–0.5 g) would serve as suitable reactants in the monitoring of oxidative deterioration of frying oil.

Both home-type and restaurant-type fryers were used to study the effects of edible films and coating methods on moisture, fat content, and quality of frying oils after frying marinated foods. The edible film components used were hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and methylcellulose (MC). Two viscosity grades (HPMC-E15 and MC-A15 at 15 cp, and HPMC-E4M and MC-A4M at 4000 cp) were selected. Applied edible films and methods of coating had no significant effect on the moisture and fat content in the sample core. The first method of coating in which samples were coated before breading resulted in the lowest surface moisture and the highest surface fat content, for all treatments except HPMC-E15. When it was used, significantly lower surface moisture contents and higher fat contents were obtained for the second method of coating (samples coated after breading). Among all the treatments, incorporating the edible film ingredient in the breading mix resulted in higher moisture and lower fat uptake.

The effect of edible film coatings for marinated foods on the quality of frying oil was also evaluated using one-day-old oil. Coating with HPMC-E15 incorporated in the breading provided the highest moisture retention and lowest fat uptake in the product surface. The other coating treatments were not significantly different from the control. Researchers are now evaluating the quality of products processed using regenerated frying oil and sensory attributes.

FY 1999 Project Activities
Researchers plan to design, develop, and test a safe filtration system for used frying oil; determine the reliability of the fluorescence assay to monitor quality of commercial regenerated oil; study the efficacy of the recovery system by evaluating the quality of products fried using the regenerated frying oil; and prevent the migration of marinating components from the product into the frying oil and remove undesirable flavor components from the frying oil by providing an edible film coating to the products.




Automated Packaging System

Project Number FP98-PC04

Project Leader

  • Wiley Holcombe, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-6144

Project Participants

  • Jim Clark, Claudia Huff, Ginny Key, Gary McMurray, Marlon Moses, and Alissa Pix, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Gary Akin, Dave Bartel, John Bowerman, Ray Landrum, Harry Ver Planck, and Lo Wilhelm, Kliklok Corporation
  • Art Christianson and Allen Pye, Rich-SeaPak Corporation

FY 1998 State Funding $241,164

Industry's Concern
Today human operators working on the production line perform manufacturing tasks. Although this technique has proven successful over the years, manufacturers are interested in finding automated alternatives. For the last six years, researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have conducted studies in the area of robotics and automation in an attempt to produce more flexible machinery to be used on the production line, i.e., machinery with similar performance criteria to that of the human.


Project Objective
To develop automation technology for loading bags of frozen food into top-load, paperboard packaging cartons.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Researchers completed physical modeling of the alternative “Shoot” and used a video-based motion analysis system on several trial drops.

Detailed configurations of the five design alternatives were completed, and the team used a selection DSP technique to rank the alternatives, based on a number of attributes, and recommended a final alternative. The final design selected was a system that includes Georgia Tech's Integrated Intelligent Belt Manipulator (IIBM) system and Kliklok's random-bucket-infeed (RBI) bag conveyor.

The team then made extensive alterations and additions to the IIBM robot, a system initially developed for and tested on fresh packaged poultry handling. The modifications addressed speed limitations and grasping changes and included adding a new gripper design and vacuum system, changing software design, and interfacing pneumatic control system and electronic system to existing industrial equipment.

In addition, Kliklok built and provided the RBI bag conveyor and an indexing carton conveyor designed by its engineering team. The project team established a goal of assembling an integrated prototype system employing both devices to test at Kliklok's manufacturing facility in Decatur, Georgia.

A line study was also performed at Rich-SeaPak in Brunswick, Georgia, to gather downtime data on Line 3 to define performance demands on the final system design.

FY 1999 Project Activities
Efforts are focused on transforming the IIBM and RBI systems into a functioning prototype system that can be first bench tested then field tested under actual production conditions.




An Automated Approach to Continuous Curing and Post-Processing of Peanuts

Project Number FP98-PC05

Project Leader

  • George Vachtsevanos, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-6252

Project Participants

  • Richard Crozier, Birdsong Peanuts Wayne Daley and Bonnie Heck, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Christopher Butts, USDA, ARS, National Peanut Research Laboratory

FY 1998 State Funding $116,902

Industry's Concern
Peanuts are the second largest cash crop in Georgia, yet foreign imports and lagging exports threaten this industry. One of the bottlenecks in peanut processing is curing (or drying). Currently, the drying process is a batch process whereby peanuts are dried in large trailers. The moisture measurements are taken manually. The result is a process that is labor-intensive, with consequent effects on curing efficiency, space utilization, and product quality.

Project Objective
To develop and demonstrate an integrated approach to the post-harvest processing and curing of peanuts.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
A major activity involved investigating the feasibility of using dielectric heaters (with a radio frequency oven) for drying peanuts. Approximately 500 pounds of donated peanuts were used in experiments. Researchers dried small batches at different peanut kernel temperatures for different lengths of time. It was found that the higher the kernel temperature, the faster the drying rate. However, even a modest heater temperature of 100ºF to 110ºF was sufficient to reduce the drying time from the 20 hours normally required by the conventional gas heaters to a new level of about 1 hour. This significant decrease in drying time makes the continuous processing of peanuts more feasible. Post-processing quality tests indicate that using the dielectric heater at low temperature levels does produce peanuts that have acceptable skin slippage, germination, and shrinkage.

Researchers also examined a new method for modeling peanut drying. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved an excellent technique for visualizing fluid distribution and movement in solid substrates. Two-dimensional MRIs of peanuts were taken (see images, opposite page). A series of such two-dimensional slices allows reconstruction of the three-dimensional fluid distribution. When taken as a function of drying time, the images could reveal how the internal fluid distribution changes during drying. This information is needed in order to develop a realistic model of the drying process, which can then be used to optimize the drying process.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project was not renewed for second- year funding. A report of completed work has been generated.




Assessment and Utilization of Beneficial Components in Georgia Agricultural Products and By-Products

Project Number FP98-PC06

Project Leader

  • Ronald Eitenmiller, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1091

Project Participants

  • Casimir Akoh, Mark Eiteman, Philip Koehler, and Robert Phillips, The University of Georgia
  • Eric Simonne, National Egg Products Corporation

FY 1998 State Funding $118,100

Industry's Concern
Nutrition and medical research continues to identify food components that have beneficial actions in maintaining health or in treating pathological conditions. Nutraceuticals, designer foods, and medical foods are playing increasingly large roles in food product development.

Project Objective
To identify beneficial food components in Georgia commodities and to develop technologies to expand their use, with an emphasis on food components and products with potential to enter the food/feed ingredient market, benefit public health, and expand utilization of Georgia commodities.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Research produced an improved method for quantification of vitamin E from peanuts and peanut products. Direct solvent extraction with hexane: ethyl acetate (90:10, v/v), saponification, and Soxhlet extraction with hexane were evaluated for their usefulness as extraction methods to determine vitamin E in peanuts and peanut butters. The direct solvent extraction procedure yielded higher values for each tocopherol homolog in peanut and peanut butter compared to the other methods.

Folate stability studies were also conducted. In the extrusion cooking process, the effects of temperature (120, 140, and 160ºC) and moisture content of feed material (20, 30, and 40%) were studied on the stability of natural occurring folate. Researchers also studied the effect of adding iron on folate retention. Folate in the extrudates, as determined by a microbiological assay using Lactobacillus rhamnosus, decreased as extrusion temperature increased (p<0.05). Moisture content had no significant effect. Folate was most stable at the 120ºC and 40% moisture (89.2% and 96.3% retention for the unfortified Fe-group and Fe-fortified group, respectively). Fe-fortification appeared to have no influence on folate stability. The study showed that the natural folate in peanut flour can withstand extrusion and that peanut flour can be a significant nutritional additive to such products.

Researchers also produced extruded products made from a combination of partially defatted peanut meal and raw sweet potato. Such products can be produced with as much as 30% by weight raw sweet potato. Stability of b-carotene was excellent through the extrusion process. Sweet potato was also extruded with cottonseed meal (44% protein) to produce a poultry feed ingredient with excellent potential to partially replace corn-soy in broiler rations. Preliminary feeding studies dramatically showed the feed value of a ration containing 75% corn-soy and 25% of a 75%–25% cottonseed meal-sweet potato extruded blend.

Peanut oil was utilized to produce structured lipids with increased caprylic acid content to produce a medium chain length triacylglyceride with potential medical uses. Structured lipid was synthesized by transeterification of peanut oil and caprylic acid.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.




UGA Food Processing Center: Advanced Research Initiatives and Technology Transfer

Project Number FP98-PC07

Project Leader

  • Romeo Toledo, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1079

Project Participants

  • Casimir Akoh, Manjeet Chinnan, Ronald Eitenmiller, Mark Harrison, Yao-Wen Huang, Yen-Con Hung, William Hurst, Phil Koehler, Dick Phillips, Anna Resurreccion, A. Estes Reynolds, Rob Shewfelt, Louise Wicker, Scott Williams, The University of Georgia
  • James Belcher, Cryovac
  • Jerry Campbell, Dixie Canner Equipment Co.
  • Richard Hull, Hickory Specialties, Inc.
  • Wolf Ludwig, Wolf-tec, Inc.

FY 1998 State Funding $336,700

Industry's Concern
In an effort to increase interaction between The University of Georgia (UGA) and the food industry, the Food Processing Center or the Food Process Research and Development Laboratory (FPRDL) was established. Industry personnel are encouraged to use the facility, and FPRDL researchers perform applied research projects as requested by industry.

Project Objective
To assist the food processing industry in identifying problems, conducting research, and transferring results.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
In FY 1998, at least 12 Georgia companies and four national companies conducted work at FPRDL. Following are highlights of major initiatives. Bunge Foods of Atlanta, Georgia, has produced a line of products using extrusion technology (tested at FPRDL), which produces cold dispersible hydrocolloids to stabilize dairy products and baked goods. Clayton Lewis of Lawrenceville, Georgia, used resources at FPRDL to develop a canned wood chip to impart a wood smoke flavor to grilled products. The commercialized product for gas grills is now marketed under the Blue Moon Woods label.

Pyramid Manufacturing of Tewksbury, Massachusetts, built and installed a working model of a radiant wall oven at FPRDL. Research studies were conducted to understand the chemistry of roasting under radiant heat and the effect of very rapid heating on microbial inactivation and product characteristics. Pyramid has successfully placed two of the units at a major meat processing corporation, and the company plans to construct a manufacturing facility in Georgia to meet the increasing demand for these units in the industry.

FPRDL has also cooperated with Wolf-tec, Inc. of Highland, New York, to explore applications of injection marination to processed poultry products. Wolf-tec donated injection equipment, and FPRDL researched the effects of marinade formulations, temperature, injector pressure, and marinade flow rate on marinade dispersion and product texture. Several national firms with operations in Georgia, including ConAgra, Continental Grain, Seabord, Fieldale, and Tyson, now have injection marination operations, and have benefited from this work.

Crider's of Lincolnton, Georgia, used resources at FPRDL to determine if a prototype for canned white meat chunks could be manufactured at its plant. Marination, cooking, and canning tests were performed at FPRDL. The company is still evaluating options. Castleberry's of Augusta, Georgia, performed tests to determine if using mechanical vacuum on cans of chicken white meat will prevent discoloration in the canned product.

FPRDL also worked with WTCS Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, to produce product prototypes to use as samples for showing to potential customers. The company is seeking to market microwaveable heat-sterilized entrees in thin profile thermostable plastic containers. Simcha Catering of Newnan, Georgia, worked with FPRDL in establishing a production facility to produce frozen Kosher entrees for airlines. Advice was given on production line layout, product handling, and packaging.

A project supported jointly by Golden State Foods of Conyers, Georgia; Hickory Specialties of Brentwood, Tennessee; and Pyramid Manufacturing of Athens, Georgia, resulted in the development of a process for fast cooking (1.5 minutes) of hamburgers to a temperature (170ºF internal) needed to kill pathogens followed by rapid freezing. The continuous flow high pressure throttling process, developed at FPRDL, is now being commercialized. The new technology removes pathogenic microorganisms from juices without loss of fresh-like flavor, in contrast to the flavor deterioration concomitant with heat pasteurization processes.

FPRDL also acquired new equipment designed to increase its capability to assist Georgia processors with demonstrating “proof of concept” and troubleshoot process or product quality problems. Major equipment additions include: an Inframetrics Therma-Cam, a sophisticated infrared camera recorder and data analysis software, which can be used for noncontact measurement of temperatures in products during the cooking process; a Rheometrics rheometer for measuring textural properties of liquid and solid foods; and a portable high pressure intensifier, which can be easily installed in a processing plant to demonstrate the effectiveness of high pressure pasteurization of fruit, juice, egg, milk, or sauce/condiments.

Lastly, a total of 569 participants attended 20 short courses/workshops, which focused on issues such as poultry and meats marination, process control, quality control, sanitation, candy technology, and HACCP development/implementation. Four issues of the Food Processing Lines newsletter, which highlights research results, were also published.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project is completed, and a report has been generated.




Quality Enhancement of Fried Foods Through Computer Visualization of the Frying Process

Project Number FP98-PC08

Project Leader

  • Manjeet Chinnan, The University of Georgia, (770) 412-4741

Project Participants

  • Jim Budd, William Bullock, Peter Presti, Tim Purdy, Scott Robertson, Michael Sinclair, Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Yen-Con Hung, P. Mallikarjunan, and Michael Ngadi, The University of Georgia
  • Hamsa Thota, Rich-SeaPak Corporation

FY 1998 State Funding $159,974

Industry's Concern
Recent studies have reported that more than 500,000 institutional and commercial restaurants in the United States are involved in deep-fat frying operations (source: Proctor & Gamble, National Restaurant Association). Health organizations throughout the country have long called for lowering the caloric intake from food products. Reducing the contribution of calories from fat is at the center of this national initiative. In fact, the U.S. Surgeon General recommends that fat consumption be reduced by 25 percent. In response to this, the food industry is continually seeking innovative processes that will result in new products with reduced fat content, appropriate moisture content, and improved quality attributes.

Project Objective
To develop a computer visualization tool to simulate physical and chemical changes in food products during deep-fat frying.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
Research activities focused on breaded food products, including butterfly shrimp, popcorn shrimp, and French toast.

The research team successfully created mathematical models to accurately reflect the frying process for complex food shapes, and developed an initial computer visualization application software prototype to test and evaluate internally.

Mathematical models for heat, moisture, and fat transfer in multiple products during deep-fat frying were developed. These models were later validated using data collected from laboratory and production-scale frying. Comparison of regression model and experimental results indicated that the model agreed closely with observed temperature, moisture, and fat contents of the products during deep-fat frying.

The computer visualization software prototype delivered striking visual images, which proved helpful in understanding the food frying process. Researchers believe the industry will be able to more readily make decisions regarding quality and process conditions during new product development using this new software tool.

FY 1999 Project Activities
The project was not renewed for second- year funding. A report of completed work has been generated.


.
FoodPAC Infrastructure Projects

During FY 1998, FoodPAC provided state funding for two major infrastructure improvement projects.

Food Science Building Renovations

FY 1998 State Funding: $1,900,000

Major renovation of existing pilot plant and associated research laboratories (Phase 1 of proposed three-phase project) at The University of Georgia's Food Science Building

FoodPAC funding was used for architectural planning and renovations to the first floor of the Food Science Building. Plans for the renovation of the building were completed, and construction is underway. The renovated floor will house three separate pilot plants: cooked foods processing, fresh fruits and vegetables processing, and raw meats/poultry/seafood processing. Offices for outreach personnel will also be added.




By-Products Pilot Plant Facilities Expansion

FY 1998 State Funding: $300,000

Renovation and expansion of the By-Products Testing Laboratories at The University of Georgia's Pilot Plant

The rapid growth and impact of by-products research have placed extraordinary stress on the limited laboratory and related space originally allocated for such activities. Currently utilized space is located in two adjacent buildings, and the space has received no renovation or upgrading since the buildings were originally occupied in the early 1960s. FoodPAC funding is being used to design, renovate, and expand these existing facilities. Plans call for upgrades to portions of the existing structures as well as construction of new laboratories and office space. This facility development, when completed, will give the pilot plant excellent facilities for conducting industry-driven studies in this growing and important focus area.

.


.
FoodPAC Implementation Projects

During FY 1998, FoodPAC undertook two implementation projects to improve communications regarding operations and project activities.

FoodPAC Website

Project Leader

  • Steven Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology

Project Participant

  • Craig Wyvill, Georgia Institute of Technology

Project Objective
To create a website that provides up-to-date information about FoodPAC operations and funded projects.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
A website was developed that contains pages highlighting what's new at FoodPAC, an overview of the program, a summary of Georgia's food industry, FoodPAC's organizational chart, a directory of FoodPAC members, and digital copies of FoodPAC publications. The FY 2000 Call for Program Proposals format is currently online at the What's New page. A copy of The 1997–1998 Annual Report and copies of past issues of The Food Chain newsletter can be found on the Publications page. Visit FoodPAC at
http://foodpac.gatech.edu


FoodPAC Brochure

Project Leader

  • Steven Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology

Project Participant

  • Angela Colar, Georgia Institute of Technology

Project Objective
To update FoodPAC brochure.

FY 1998 Project Activities and Outcomes
The FoodPAC Brochure, which was first created in FY 1996, was updated. The revised brochure reflects changes to FoodPAC's operating strategy and leadership roles. It also outlines the program's investment strategy, general operations, and describes how research results are reported. An updated section highlighting the Food Industry in Georgia is also featured.


.
FoodPAC FY 1999 Program Projects

Environmental Projects

Georgia Environmental Technical Assistance Program for Food Processors
(Continuation of Project Number FP98-EN01)

Project Number: FP99-EN01

Co-Project Leaders

  • Jackie Sellers, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-8382, jsellers@bae.uga.edu
  • James Walsh, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-8054, jim.walsh@gtri.gatech.edu
  • William Merka, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-9151, bmerka@uga.edu
  • A. Estes Reynolds, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-2574, ereynold@uga.cc.uga.edu
  • Egerton Whittle, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-7690, ewhittle@uga.cc.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $179,500




Evaluating Alternative Uses for Cottonseed Meal: Increasing Utilization in Poultry and Other Animal Rations

Project Number: FP99-EN02

Project Leader

  • Romeo Toledo, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1079, cmsromeo@uga.cc.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $216,000




Enhanced Ozone-Ultraviolet Reconditioning of Food Processing Wastewaters for Reuse

Project Number: FP99-EN03

Co-Project Leaders

  • S. Edward Law, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-0866, edlaw@bae.uga.edu
  • Michael Doyle, The University of Georgia, (770) 228-7284, mdoyle@cfsqe.griffin.peachnet.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $149,500




Fermentation of Food Waste Carbohydrates

Project Number: FP99-EN04

Project Leader

  • Mark Eiteman, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-0833, eiteman@bae.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $150,000




Food Safety Projects Prewashing of Shell Eggs with High Oxidation Potential Water Followed by High Pressure Pasteurization for Elimination of Salmonella and Listeria in Liquid Egg Products
(Continuation of Project Number FP98-FS02)

Project Number: FP99-FS01

Project Leader

  • Yen-Con Hung, The University of Georgia, (770) 412-4739, yhung@cfsqe.griffin.peachnet.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $99,390



Application of an I.O. Biosensor: An Innovative Approach for Detecting Foodborne Microbial Pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli, and Salmonella Species) During Slaughtering and Processing of Poultry

Project Number: FP99-FS02

Co-Project Leaders

  • Nile Hartman, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-3503, nile.hartman@gtri.gatech.edu
  • Daniel Campbell, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-3627, daniel.campbell@gtri.gatech.edu
  • Paul Edmonds, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-3737, paul.edmonds@biology.gatech.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $79,017




Inactivation of Foodborne Pathogens on Fruits and Vegetables by Combinations of GRAS Chemicals

Project Number: FP99-FS03

Project Leader

  • Michael Doyle, The University of Georgia, (770) 228-7284, mdoyle@cfsqe.griffin.peachnet.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $39,924




Process and Product Competitiveness Projects Yield and Quality Optimization of Pre-Cooked Oven Roasted and Breaded/Fried Poultry and Seafood

Project Number: FP99-PC01

Project Leader

  • Romeo Toledo, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1079, cmsromeo@uga.cc.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $267,800




Extending the Quality and Utilization of Frying Oils and Improving the Quality of Fried Foods
(Continuation of Project Number FP98-PC03)

Project Number: FP99-PC03

Co-Project Leaders

  • Casimir Akoh, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-1067, akoh@flavor.fst.uga.edu
  • A. Estes Reynolds, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-2574, ereynold@uga.cc.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $155,700




Real-Time System for Defect Detection

Project Number: FP99-PC04

Project Leader

  • Wayne Daley, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 385-0034, wayne.daley@gtri.gatech.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $141,279




Food Nutrient Analysis of Georgia Peanuts and Peanut Products

Project Number: FP99-PC05

Project Leader

  • Ronald Eitenmiller, The University of Georgia, (706) 542-2286, eiteman@bae.uga.edu

FY 1999 State Funding: $66,890




Automated Packaging System
(Continuation of Project Number FP98-PC04)

Project Number: FP99-PC06

Co-Project Leaders

  • Wiley Holcombe, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-6144, wiley.holcombe@gtri.gatech.edu
  • Gary McMurray, Georgia Institute of Technology, (404) 894-8057, gary.mcmurray@gtri.gatech.edu

FY 1998 State Funding: $245,000


.
Major Infrastructure Improvement Projects

Food Processing Technology Research Building, Georgia Institute of Technology

FY 1999 State Funding: $200,000

Planning grant for a design feasibility study




Food Science Building, The University of Georgia

FY 1999 State Funding: $187,000

Planning grant for major renovation of existing pilot plant and associated research laboratories (Phase 2 of proposed three-phase project)



By-Products Pilot Plant, The University of Georgia

FY 1999 State Funding: $100,000

Final renovation and expansion of existing pilot plant



.
Major Equipment Upgrades

FoodPAC Research Study Testing at The University of Georgia

FY 1999 State Funding: $87,000

Purchase of an Instron Universal Testing Machine (to measure the physical properties of foods which can be correlated to the quality characteristics of food products) for the Center for Food Safety and Quality Enhancement and a Reach-in Environmental Chamber (to study the shelf life of processed products and to determine changes in quality during storage) for the Food Processing Center


.

Return to the FOODPAC Homepage . . . . . . . . . . Return to FoodPAC Publications


-

Authored by the
Food Processing Technology Division
Georgia Tech Research Institute
Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0823 USA
Telephone: 404-894-3412

Make comments pertaining to this website to:
Steven Thomas <steven.thomas@gtri.gatech.edu>

Copyright © 2000 FoodPAC
Last Modified: January 2000
URL: foodpac.gatech.edu

gear